Sure it is. But explain this to the lazy bums out there :-P
Nah, honestly, I dont think theres a real reason except the big step having to update gcc.
Alex Ionescu schrieb:
Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing.
On 2009-12-31, at 12:15 AM, Daniel Reimer wrote:
Good question. I wonder, too. Problem could be that this patch forces ppl to use a new RosBE. At least last time i tried, it broke gcc 4.1.X build.
Alex Ionescu schrieb:
Hi,
As far as I am aware, GCC 4.4.x now works on Linux through RosBE 1.5 (minus some missing patches for 64-bit hosts), and I've gotten it to work on SnowLeopard with some minor hacks -- ie, all that's missing is for Colin, when he has time, to integrate the little fixes for these non-standard hosts.
As for Windows, I think there is a fully working binary GCC 4.4.x/RosBE that builds trunk just fine.
So what's missing for 4.4.x to become official, RosBE 1.5 to RTM, and for the 4.4.x patch from BZ to be committed (The one that gets trunk building)?
Best regards, Alex Ionescu
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Best regards, Alex Ionescu
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev