On 08.10.2013 20:47, Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO wrote:
ros-csrss
Last commit says "Ready for merging (TM) :)". ORLY? :-)
Keep it for
reference still one year, maybe ? After it can go away (yet
there are some interesting URLs in some commits messages).
SVN keeps it infinitely
as long as we backup the repository properly.
However, I prefer to svn copy/svn move files, or reintegrate the branch
into trunk so that the history is not lost. If it's lost in your case,
it really sucks. Maybe you would need to add some comment to the csrss
code files specifying the branch name and revisions when it existed.
----------
Now global questions / remarks :
arwinss
Aleksey - do you need it? Yes I do!! :-)
We all think so ; some time ago (when I
merged ros-csrss) I promised to try
to fix the console thing in arwinss too; it's obvious that most of the work
is in the win32csr --> winsrv / basesrv / csrsrv switch, and taking into
account some add-ins done by you Aleksey, and also with the recent work on
adding functionality to basesrv and winsrv to make Win2k3 core dlls runnable
into ROS.
Thank you, would be cool.
c++-bringup
Very promising name and just one commit by jgardou, 8th of March, 2012.
We can
already compile c++ things with GCC / MSVC now, iirc.
So, candidate for deletion?
nslookup
I guess lsuggs gave up on that. But the idea was nice.
olpc
One awesome Laptop Per one awesome Child. We can keep it a bit more for
historical
reasons.
What was their purpose ? (just to know)
Purpose of what?
Tree-restructure-test
Playground for restructuring the tree. "Let's reshuflle the files and
directories and that makes our OS more stable and usable". Last commit was
almost exactly 3 years ago.
I'm personally very interested in this thing (cf.
http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=102258&sid=ef8d6c9a27f9e38…
ff87afdc5919 and OF COURSE
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Techwiki:File_Layout
) which aims at bringing modularity.
Yes, it's fun, but I will spoil it saying
that there are more important
things to do first :-)
Regards,
Aleksey