On 08.10.2013 20:47, Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO wrote:
ros-csrss Last commit says "Ready for merging (TM) :)". ORLY? :-)
Keep it for reference still one year, maybe ? After it can go away (yet there are some interesting URLs in some commits messages).
SVN keeps it infinitely as long as we backup the repository properly. However, I prefer to svn copy/svn move files, or reintegrate the branch into trunk so that the history is not lost. If it's lost in your case, it really sucks. Maybe you would need to add some comment to the csrss code files specifying the branch name and revisions when it existed.
Now global questions / remarks :
arwinss Aleksey - do you need it? Yes I do!! :-)
We all think so ; some time ago (when I merged ros-csrss) I promised to try to fix the console thing in arwinss too; it's obvious that most of the work is in the win32csr --> winsrv / basesrv / csrsrv switch, and taking into account some add-ins done by you Aleksey, and also with the recent work on adding functionality to basesrv and winsrv to make Win2k3 core dlls runnable into ROS.
Thank you, would be cool.
c++-bringup Very promising name and just one commit by jgardou, 8th of March, 2012.
We can already compile c++ things with GCC / MSVC now, iirc.
So, candidate for deletion?
nslookup I guess lsuggs gave up on that. But the idea was nice. olpc One awesome Laptop Per one awesome Child. We can keep it a bit more for
historical reasons.
What was their purpose ? (just to know)
Purpose of what?
Tree-restructure-test Playground for restructuring the tree. "Let's reshuflle the files and
directories and that makes our OS more stable and usable". Last commit was almost exactly 3 years ago.
I'm personally very interested in this thing (cf. http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=102258&sid=ef8d6c9a27f9e380... ff87afdc5919 and OF COURSE http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Techwiki:File_Layout ) which aims at bringing modularity.
Yes, it's fun, but I will spoil it saying that there are more important things to do first :-)
Regards, Aleksey