Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting - April 2012

[Andrew Faulds]

Internal affairs? What internal affairs? If this was about legal
issues and thinks that definitely cannot be open to the public, I'd be
okay with it. But this is an open-source project, no? Surely meetings
should be public?

On 27 April 2012 11:38, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>   It's just you, unless you can name a company that
> has their meetings in
>  public?
>
>  Meetings are for the members of organizations set goals, deal with issues
>  and discuss behind the scenes information.
>  Why should non-members have the right to listen in on internal affairs?
>
>  Ged.
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>  Behalf Of Emanuel Rietveld
>  Sent: 27 April 2012 11:24
>  To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting - April 2012
>
>  On 04/26/2012 07:38 PM, Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
> >   Hi,
> >
> >  This meeting will be private. If you do
> >  not have access, you will not be able to attend the meeting.
> >
> >  Regards,
> >  
>  Is it just me, or this a little like spraying contributor repellant on
>  your project?
>
>  Kind Regards,
>
>  Emanuel
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 


-- 
Andrew Faulds (AJF)
http://ajf.me/