7 Feb
2007
7 Feb
'07
6:03 a.m.
+1
just my $0.02
Best regards,
Logan_V8
On 2/6/07, art yerkes <ayerkes(a)speakeasy.net> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:07:26 -0500
Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> wrote:
Hi all,
After talking to some developers about the recent state of the ReactOS
tree, compiler times and disk space, I've analyzed our tree and found
the following preliminary round of changes that should be made to stay
in line with our policy that ReactOS provides what Windows does, at the
core level. Any extra functionality or applications not provided by
Windows have always been supposed to go into rosapps, as well as test
applications. For testing/regression testing, I actually recommend the
creation of a ros-tests repository, which will contain the tests in
rosapps plus the ones I've mentionned below.
This isn't just about disk space or compiling speed, but also to keep
our tree clean and conformant.
Here's the list:
Overall I agree with most of these, but I would rethink moving drivers to
rosapps. Maybe there should be a place for non-core drivers? Sounds like
a good idea for the most part.
--
The way out is via the door. Why is it that no one will use this method? - Confucius
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev