I can test it, but I dont think I can offer much feedback on the actual
content of the code. I will post my testing results sometime this weekend.
Brandon
Aleksey Bragin wrote:
I think all kernel devs should review this patch to
the trunk and
write their comments, and when everything is settled down and no
regressions happens, we apply it to trunk. And after this step we can
ask Alex to provide a patch for Cc branch.
The changes by this patch are huge, so I'd like all forces to be
pointed to reviewing this patch.
In fact, this is the greatest thing ever, because now, at last, we
can clearly see what is compatible, what is not, which structure is
of which version.
So in 2 simply-said sentences:
1) Everyone - REVIEW the patch! (please :-)). Special note to
WaxDragon: Please, apply the patch and test the resulting system (if
it boots, of course).
2) After commiting, it's gonna be merged into Cc branch
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
On May 4, 2006, at 10:24 PM, Maarten Bosma wrote:
Could you please also provide a patch for the cc
branch ?
Maarten Bosma
Alex Ionescu wrote:
Hi,
Not to sound like an asshole, I know a lot of you are busy (Thanks
Thomas), but this patch is probably the most single important thing
right now and is also a pretty big showstopper before Ge can fully
work
on ntoskrnl, so I would really appreciate if you guys would actually
take a look at it?
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev