Re: [ros-dev] 4th scenario

[David Quintana (gigaherz)]

No one is suggesting paging the kernel. Stop being paranoid about that. We
are speaking about API interfaces for user apps and drivers. Whatever that
implies, will be examined on a case by case basis.  ;P

On 22 May 2016 at 23:14, Love Nystrom <love.nystrom(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>   Server 2oo3 might not be used in big corporations
> anymore,
>  but I think it's not uncommon to keep running it in small companies
>  and home servers (due to high licensing cost of Windows server versions).
>  Anyway.. IMO there's nothing wrong in moving towards NT6x API-wise,
>  as long as we're not forced to re-architect the *core* of the system
>  (scheduler, et c).  Paging the kernel would be a big mistake.
>
>  Best Regards
>  // Neo
>
>
>  On 2016-05-22 18.42, ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org wrote:
>
>  They are not fucked up, since they legitimately don't care for the 3
>  people out there still using 2k3.
>  And we are not fucked up, we are only pushed to move to NT6+
>
>  Timo
>
>  Am 21.05.2016 um 06:12 schrieb Love Nystrom:
>
>  No, they are... Not we ;)
>  Same thing would happen if you try to run e.g. a Vista exe on NT4.
>
>  // Neo
>
>  On 2016-05-20 22.52, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <elhoir(a)gmail.com>
>  <elhoir(a)gmail.com> <elhoir(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >   Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Pale Moon drops ReactOS
> > support
> >  Date: 2016-05-20 22.51
> >
> >  4th scenario - App is actually "buggy" and doesnt check for any export. 
> We´re fucked up :P
>
>
>  --
>  There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
>  and that's an idea whose time has come. [Victor Hugo]
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>