RE: [ros-dev] core reorg. request

[Gunnar Dalsnes]

>   So thrdobj.c is more descriptive than for example
> ps/thread.c? Hmmm!?
>   
We would still have thread.c. 

thrdobj.c would fex. just include code to manage the ObjectManager type
"PsThreadType", for the moment being only PsInitThreadManagment and
PiDeleteThread, but later when/if security functions etc. are added it might
make more sense. It's almost eqvivalent to putting a class and its member
functions into an own file.

Anyways, this is just a suggestion. The reason for this proposal was that i
looked thru the thread/process code, and i see stuff that looks like it
belong into the ctor/dtor of an object. Having own files for types
w/functions might make this more clear.

Nt reorg. update:
-some wants to keep nt functions where they are (currently they are in \nt
and spread around in misc. files)
-some wants to move nt functions into end of files in related subsystems
(nt\ntsem.c -> ke\sem.c etc)
-some wants to move nt functions into related subsystems, but in own files
(nt\ntsem.c -> ke\ntsem.c etc)

Hmmmmm........

Regard
Gunnar

>   
>  Regards,
>  Eric
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  
>  
>  
>