Re: [ros-dev] Yet another case of required Viista APIs...

[Alex Ionescu]

I like it, I would actually propose creating:

kernel32.dll
kernel32_vista.dll
kernel32_win7.dll
etc...

instead of just "kernelsup"

What is important to me is that kernel32.dll remains 2003 kernel32.dll

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org> wrote:
>   On 17.03.2013 20:25, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
> >  
> >  We can avoid that by organizing our code in static libraries and merge
> >  them all together to 2 core dlls.
> >  The division like on Windows 7: kernelbase + kernel32 + advapi32, doesn't
> >  work for us, since kernel32 and advapi32 would still need to contain Vista+
> >  APIs.
> >  Therefore I suggest to divide it into kernelbase.dll and kernelsup.dll,
> >  the latter containing the code that remains in kernel32 and advapi32 on
> >  Windows. 
>  I like that.
>
>  It would be interesting to listen to Alex's opinion on this matter.
>
>  Regards,
>  Aleksey Bragin
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev