So the testbot should stop giving invalid values -- or are you saying that
this would ASSERT on Windows too and also kill Testbot? Then now we are
clearly changing Windows behavior.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de> wrote:
Because it causes havoc on our testbot.
Question to you: Why should we? We are replicating "normal" Windows
behavior, not Windows debugging code.
Am 11.10.2014 18:45, schrieb Alex Ionescu:
Windows does. Why shouldn't we? It's a non-documented API.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:52 AM, <tkreuzer(a)svn.reactos.org> wrote:
Author: tkreuzer
Date: Sat Oct 11 08:52:33 2014
New Revision: 64658
URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=64658&view=rev
Log:
[NTDLL]
Don't assert that the caller of exported APIs passes correct parameters.
Modified:
trunk/reactos/dll/ntdll/ldr/ldrapi.c
Modified: trunk/reactos/dll/ntdll/ldr/ldrapi.c
URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/ntdll/ldr/ldrapi.c?rev…
==============================================================================
--- trunk/reactos/dll/ntdll/ldr/ldrapi.c [iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/reactos/dll/ntdll/ldr/ldrapi.c [iso-8859-1] Sat Oct 11
08:52:33 2014
@@ -209,9 +209,6 @@
/* A normal failure */
return STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER_3;
}
-
- /* Do or Do Not. There is no Try */
- ASSERT((Disposition != NULL) || !(Flags &
LDR_LOCK_LOADER_LOCK_FLAG_TRY_ONLY));
/* If the flag is set, make sure we have a valid pointer to use */
if ((Flags & LDR_LOCK_LOADER_LOCK_FLAG_TRY_ONLY) && !(Disposition))
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing listRos-dev@reactos.orghttp://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev