Aleksey Bragin wrote:
Exactly what I was telling yesterday in IRC.
I can only remember that you asked, if it would really fix something. ;) And yes it does. Just not the fully correct way.
This assert is caused by recursive user call, not vice versa!!
True. But the recursive usercall is valid. Please take a look at the article I linked. It should simply end at some point when no more kernel stack is available.
Revert?
What about the updated code I send?