No. Not even coverity seems to have caught this.

Am 16.10.2014 07:59, schrieb Alex Ionescu:
Wow, does static analyzer really not catch this?

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:03 PM, <tkreuzer@svn.reactos.org> wrote:
Author: tkreuzer
Date: Wed Oct 15 22:03:50 2014
New Revision: 64757

URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=64757&view=rev
Log:
[NTOSKRNL]
Don't use an uninitialized variable in MmArmAccessFault (Alex, please review). Brought to you by MSVC runtime checks.

Modified:
    trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c

Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c?rev=64757&r1=64756&r2=64757&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c   [iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c   [iso-8859-1] Wed Oct 15 22:03:50 2014
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@
     NTSTATUS Status;
     PMMSUPPORT WorkingSet;
     ULONG ProtectionCode;
-    PMMVAD Vad;
+    PMMVAD Vad = NULL;
     PFN_NUMBER PageFrameIndex;
     ULONG Color;
     BOOLEAN IsSessionAddress;





_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev