I would suggest against using submodules, but we can discus that in the meeting, if you want. There's alternatives.
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 21:21, Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO hermes.belusca@sfr.fr wrote:
Hi,
This sounds interesting, for potential developers wanting just to work on some module, but not wanting to deal with the whole OS thing. Would this mean that we also have to think about git submodules? Because (in the case of the NTFS driver for example) it would be in a different git repo, and then it would have to be automatically downloaded and updated whenever one of the core ROS dev updates his own ROS git repo.
Cheers, Hermes
-----Message d'origine----- De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] De la part de Ged
Murphy
Envoyé : mercredi 1 août 2018 20:16 À : 'ReactOS Development List' Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Postponing the July Meeting
I have an item for the agenda. I'd like to discuss the possibility of
moving some
of our drivers out of the main repo and into something more convenient.
In case I don't make the meeting, I'll put forward some of my reasons
here:
This thought has come about due to the btrfs driver which we use from
Mark
Harmstone. Mark's project receives quite a bit of interest on github,
and I'm
assuming one of the reasons is that it's so easy to find and build.
Searching for
'btrfs windows' lists his project as the top hit in google, and building
is as simple
as cloning, opening the project in VS and clicking build (assuming you
have the
WDK)
I'm wondering if we did the same thing to some of our drivers, we might generate more interest in them. A good example would be our NTFS driver. When searching for open source NTFS solutions you're only really given
Linux
and Max options. The reactos driver is buried deep in the search list,
and you
only see it if you know what you're looking for. Next if you want to
build it, you
need to clone the main reactos repo, install the build tools, setup and
build the
environment, build the tool chain, build the linkers libs, etc, etc.
There are so
many barriers for people who aren't part of the reactos development team
that
the chance of getting anyone interested in it are practically zero.
This process would be much simpler if the code was available to clone as
a
separate project, and could simply build with the WDK and VS. There's
then a
chance that it might start to generate interest, and people may start
working
on it instead of it just bit-rotting deep in our main repo.
If we're going to do that, why not consider others too. Network cards,
sound
stack, USB, boot loaders, printer drivers, directx, etc, There's lots of
things that
people might be interested in working on and using if they weren't tied
to the
reactos code base. We obviously benefit from any external interest, and
simply
pull/import it back into the reactos project.
Ged.
-----Original Message----- From: Ros-dev ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org On Behalf Of Colin Finck Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2018 17:58 To: 'ReactOS Development List' ros-dev@reactos.org Subject: [ros-dev] Postponing the July Meeting
Hi all!
Looking at the calendar, it would be time for the July Meeting today. However, I didn't receive any agenda proposals and also forgot to
announce it
in the course of releasing 0.4.9. So I suggest we postpone the meeting to next week's Thursday, August 2.
Please send agenda proposals by then. That meeting also allows us to handle last-minute planning regarding the Hackfest.
Best regards,
Colin
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev