Thanks!
Press as usual likes flashy topics, so of course everyone edited the
news text as he liked, but I like it. ReactOS needed some kick, it
was quite sad to see some kind of stagnation (even though everyone
did their best, it's just lack of human resources for specific tasks).
If we make arwinss (or however it's going to be branded) succeed
quickly, it's the best ever road to switch to beta with huge apps
support, and put resources into more interesting things like real
hardware bringing up, file systems support, and finally, after so
many years, actually start using our OS. It would be fantastic to
notice "ReactOS" in general web/whatever statistics sum ups.
On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Gregor Schneider wrote:
Now that I understand the driver concept behind arwinss I think
that arwinss is the right approach for the project.
Looking at the current development approach win32 user and kernel
components will not be finished anytime soon and will probably
never work 100%. We're just missing specialised developers to
achieve that.
Furthermore mixing Wine and ReactOS codes on function level like
done in those components complicates matters dramatically and
consumes energies that could be used in better ways.
Summing that up: I like the idea, should indeed be a big push for
application compability.
Actually I'm surprised we don't see a big controversial discussion
around this idea like everyone expected.
Concerning the picture on page 25 of the presentation: I remember
having seen the start menu side bar cropped like this before in
some of my tests. Was it StretchDIBits, or rather StretchBlt? I'll
find out.
Best regards,
Gregor Schneider
P.S: Quite interesting how the press judged this announcement:
"ReactOS about to restart" is what I read today on a german
technology news page.