21 Jan
2010
21 Jan
'10
7:05 p.m.
why?
Sent from my iPod
Andrew Faulds (andrewweb)
On 21 Jan 2010, at 18:50, Alwyn Tan <alwyn.tan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I blame andrewweb.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Aleksey Bragin
<aleksey(a)reactos.org> wrote:
On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Ged Murphy wrote:
I'll show how this got started...
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php?
title=Arwinss&diff=27579&oldid=27578
It was news to me too.... I wrote that after seeing this:
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php?
title=Arwinss&diff=27396&oldid=27018
and similar changes there done when I was away.
As every piece of software, Arwinss (Wine32) is a stopgap between
v1.0 and v3.0. When something better evolves, surely we'll use it.
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
James Tabor wrote:
>> Although Jim likes the hyperbole, he is right. Arwinss is a stop
gap
solution that should eventually be deprecated except
for the X11
module and used as a basis for verifying the 'correct' win32
subsystem.
I'm for both! One will not replace the other... I have no idea how
that got started! Amazing!
Posted this before!