RE: [ros-dev] Coordinator Term Limits

[Casper Hornstrup]

I agree that there should be no mandatory "break". What if someone
really good at a job couldn't be elected due to this rule and none
else would want it or there was only persons left which were really
bad at the job?

As the project grows there will be more coordinators. We could end
up in election hell. IMO, giving any Registered Project Member the
right to call for an election at any time, should be enough.

Casper
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Brian Palmer
> Sent: 17. oktober 2005 07:18
> To: 'ReactOS Development List'
> Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Coordinator Term Limits
>
> I wouldn't mind coordinator term limits. But I think that as long as the
> coordinators are elected then there should be no mandatory "break". If they
> get re-elected it's probably because they did a good job and deserve to be
> re-elected.
>
> -Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> Behalf Of Royce Mitchell III
> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 10:09 PM
> To: ReactOS Development List
> Subject: [ros-dev] Coordinator Term Limits
>
> I think we should consider term limits to the coordinator positions.
>
> I can think of two ways to do it:
> no one can hold a single coordinator position for more than 2 years.
>
> After which he/she must take at least a one year break from *that*
> position before he/she can run again.
> no one can hold any coordinator position for more than 2 years. After
>
> which he/she must take a break from coordinating all-together before
> he/she can run for a coordinator position.
>
> Personally, I think #1 would be sufficient, but thought I'd present #2
> for completeness sake.
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev