Re: [ros-dev] Ros-dev Digest, Vol 80, Issue 28

[Dimas FranK]

Thanks for
  attention tone
 I was thinking of developing for ntfs
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=NTFS

2011/4/25, [e-mail] [e-mail]:
> Send Ros-dev mailing list submissions to
>    [e-mail]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    [e-mail]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    [e-mail]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ros-dev digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
> Re: Implementing ScmAssignNewTag (bug 6147) (Eric Kohl)
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:09:19 +0200
> From: Eric Kohl [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Implementing ScmAssignNewTag (bug 6147)
> To: ReactOS Development List [e-mail]
> Message-ID: [e-mail]
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hello Thomas,
>
> your plan sounds good to me. Just implement ScmAssingnNewTag and attach
> the patch to bug #6147. I will review and and apply your patch if it is OK.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
> Thomas Faber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm thinking about implementing the ScmAssignNewTag function in
> > base\system\services\rpcserver.c because of
> > http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6147
> >
> > My current plan would be: loop through all service keys in the
> > registry, check the Tag values for all that are in the same group,
> > and choose either max+1 or the first unused tag.
> >
> > Any opinions? Would it be important to observe how Windows calculates
> > tags? Perhaps Eric has a good overview and thus an opinion on this
> > service stuff? ;)
> >
> > Thanks. :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tom
> >
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> End of Ros-dev Digest, Vol 80, Issue 28