Re: [ros-dev] Ros-dev Digest, Vol 80, Issue 28

[Dimas FranK]

Thanks for
  attention tone
 I was thinking of developing for ntfs
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=NTFS

2011/4/25, ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org <ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org>rg>:
>   Send Ros-dev mailing list submissions to
>  	ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>
>  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>  	http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>  	ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org
>
>  You can reach the person managing the list at
>  	ros-dev-owner(a)reactos.org
>
>  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>  than "Re: Contents of Ros-dev digest..."
>
>
>  Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: Implementing ScmAssignNewTag (bug 6147) (Eric Kohl)
>
>
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Message: 1
>  Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:09:19 +0200
>  From: Eric Kohl <eric.kohl(a)t-online.de>
>  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Implementing ScmAssignNewTag (bug 6147)
>  To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
>  Message-ID: <4DB4755F.1040003(a)t-online.de>
>  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>  Hello Thomas,
>
>  your plan sounds good to me. Just implement ScmAssingnNewTag and attach
>  the patch to bug #6147. I will review and and apply your patch if it is OK.
>
>  Regards,
>  Eric
>
>
>  Thomas Faber wrote:
> >   Hi,
> >
> >  I'm thinking about implementing the ScmAssignNewTag function in
> >  base\system\services\rpcserver.c because of
> >  http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6147
> >
> >  My current plan would be: loop through all service keys in the
> >  registry, check the Tag values for all that are in the same group,
> >  and choose either max+1 or the first unused tag.
> >
> >  Any opinions? Would it be important to observe how Windows calculates
> >  tags? Perhaps Eric has a good overview and thus an opinion on this
> >  service stuff? ;)
> >
> >  Thanks. :)
> >
> >  Regards,
> >  Tom
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>  End of Ros-dev Digest, Vol 80, Issue 28
>  ***************************************
>