Royce Mitchell III wrote:
  Magnus Olsen wrote:
> Hi I have not test run this code. But i think this form maby are
> faster that v3 of  Royce  Mitchell III code it leave to the compiler
> to optimze it more or I complete wrong
> int highest_bit ( unsigned int i )
> {
>     int ret = 0;
>     int n ;
>     int t;
>     int x;
>
>    for (t = 0; t>3;t++)
>   {
>      x = (16 << t);
>      n = i >> x;
>     if ( n )  i = n, ret  += x ;
>   }
>      return ret + (i>>1);
> }
>
>
> 
Unfortunately your code is broken in a couple ways, most notably the
code inside the for() statement never executes. When I fix it to work
correctly, it takes almost 3x longer than my code :(