Sounds like a plan. And then gradually implement necessary kernel functionality as it is needed. On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 01:18:36 +1100, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gardou@laposte.net wrote:
So, for kernel we keep our own importibs, adding exports one after the other while we implement them, and for user mode dlls we keep >win7 compatible ones?
We need an official stance on this matter.
Le 13/11/2010 03:10, Ged Murphy a écrit :
The target is only win2k3 in the kernel. Everything else is open to discussion (in fact, IMO even the kernel compatibility is >>open to discussion) You should, and must, provide as much functionality as possible with the latest versions of Windows. You can still provide many of the capabilities of Windows 7 using only an NT5.2 kernel. It's only the internal architecture >>which limits this, and in terms of many win7 capabilities, this kernel isn't a limiting factor.
2010/11/13 Jérôme Gardou jerome.gardou@laposte.net
As our target is win2k3 sp1 compatibility,
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev