Sounds like a plan. And then gradually implement necessary kernel
functionality as it is needed.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 01:18:36 +1100, Jérôme Gardou
<jerome.gardou(a)laposte.net> wrote:
So, for kernel we keep our own importibs, adding
exports one after the
other while we implement them, and for user mode dlls we keep >win7
compatible ones?
We need an official stance on this matter.
Le 13/11/2010 03:10, Ged Murphy a écrit :
The target is only win2k3 in the kernel.
Everything else is open to
discussion (in fact, IMO even the kernel compatibility is >>open to
discussion)
You should, and must, provide as much functionality as possible with
the latest versions of Windows.
You can still provide many of the capabilities of Windows 7 using only
an NT5.2 kernel. It's only the internal architecture >>which limits
this, and in terms of many win7 capabilities, this kernel isn't a
limiting factor.
2010/11/13 Jérôme Gardou <jerome.gardou(a)laposte.net>
As our target is win2k3 sp1 compatibility,
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
--
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.