Sounds like a plan. And then gradually implement necessary kernel
functionality as it is needed.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 01:18:36 +1100, Jérôme Gardou
<jerome.gardou(a)laposte.net> wrote:
  So, for kernel we keep our own importibs, adding
exports one after the
 other while we implement them, and for user mode dlls we keep >win7
 compatible ones?
 We need an official stance on this matter.
 Le 13/11/2010 03:10, Ged Murphy a écrit :
  The target is only win2k3 in the kernel.
Everything else is open to
 discussion (in fact, IMO even the kernel compatibility is >>open to
 discussion)
 You should, and must, provide as much functionality as possible with
 the latest versions of Windows.
 You can still provide many of the capabilities of Windows 7 using only
 an NT5.2 kernel. It's only the internal architecture >>which limits
 this, and in terms of many win7 capabilities, this kernel isn't a
 limiting factor.
 2010/11/13 Jérôme Gardou <jerome.gardou(a)laposte.net>
 As our target is win2k3 sp1 compatibility, 
 _______________________________________________
 Ros-dev mailing list
 Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
 
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev   
--
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.