Hi,
Ged Murphy wrote:
Firstly, that text is written for usenet not email,
which IMO is both
It's a mailing list. So it's closer to usenet than to "normal"
email IMO.
ancient and very unix orientated.
What does usenet have todo with unix?
Secondly, it's rather difficult to write emails in
that format using
outlook, which is by far the world's most popular and best email client.
Maybe that would be a good reason to switch the email client? ;-)
So, I would argue that that link is rather obsolete.
Well, it contains several points that make reading messages in mailings
lists more readable. Especially:
- Quoting the whole email that you answer to (including headers and
signatures etc) is useless and only wastes traffic and the readers time.
- Writing your message on top of the original might work once, but as
soon as multiple replys are written, everything starts to turn into an
upside down mess.
-----Original Message-----
From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of Danny Götte
Sent: 13 September 2009 22:03
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4
Lots of useless information here. It's already in the headers if you
really need it. Everyone should know where this stuff came from and to
what it answers. That's what your client should keep track of.
Hi,
sorry for OT, but
http://learn.to/quote/
thanks
Quotes should start with leading ">" to make it more readable.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Quoting signatures / footers is a waste of space.
Regards,
Timo