I’m all for using .NET 3.5. I think everyone should be using it now.
I only sent this email because I know some people are stubborn to change.
Rethinking it now though, only devs and testers are really gonna be using this tool
If they haven’t upgraded then I wonder what the reason could be. I can’t really think of a good reason not to.
Ged.
If i may say anything, I dont think its a good idea to force NET 3.5 dependency. It`ll reduce the software usability range as not everyone is willing to upgrade from NET 2.0
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:11:16 +0100
From: "gedmurphy" <gedmurphy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [gschneider] 36737: RosDbg Part
3/3: - Named pipe implementation based on .net namespace IO.Pipes with
support of threads - Previous win32 test version would strip random
characters from debug messages and crash on entering kdbg (related t
To: <ros-dev@reactos.org>
Message-ID: <001901c92d1c$083d7770$18b86650$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I'd originally refrained from doing it this way, using pinvoke instead to keep .net 2.0 compatibility.
Using classes such as NamedPipeServerStream forces a .net 3.5 dependency. Is this ok with everyone?
Ged.