Re: [ros-dev] core reorg. request

"Gunnar Dalsnes" <hardon(a)online.no> wrote:


>   Does anyone object agains:
>  -moving every NtXxx functions into new files under ntoskrnl\nt? 
I don't think it makes sense because most of the Nt functions are just
wrappers around underlying object functions (eg. NtSetEvent/KeSetEvent).
IMHO, moving the Nt functions closer to the underlying objects makes more
sense (nt/ntevent.c --> ke/ntevent.c) and keep the original names of the
objects file so we will have 'ke/event.c' and 'ke/ntevent.c'.

>   -moveing functions related to ob managed types into
> new files (thrdobj.c,
>  procobj,c, eventobj.c, fileobj.c etc)?
>
> This will make it clearer where the functions are and what they do. 
So thrdobj.c is more descriptive than for example ps/thread.c? Hmmm!?


Regards,
Eric