It doesn't violate our style guidelines at all, unless you know of some guidelines that I am not aware of and that are not in the wiki. In that case maybe you should discuss them with the other developers first :)
None of my code has () around individual variables.

We also have no strict guidelines for a number of other formatting details, yet developers often reformat code if they think it looks better that way. And I generally see no problem with it.

Maybe you should relax a bit and stop being that picky.
It's not like the world will cease to exist, just because someone changed a few lines of your code ;-)

--
Timo

Am 14.11.2012 21:46, schrieb Alex Ionescu:
With all due respect Riccardo, this isn't an issue up for debate among users -- this is a developer-internal matter.

Hermes, there are good reasons why we pick double () around things, mainly around consistency. If you feel the need to start a discussion around coding style, please do so, on the proper channel and involve the devs, but don't start re-writing other people's code that was conformant to the design guidelines! This is what's worse about your change: it's not that you decide do ignore our style guidelines (which would already be bad), it's that you decided to rewrite someone else's code (that was respecting guidelines)!

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Riccardo Bestetti <riccardo.kyogre@live.it> wrote:
It makes it easier to read in my opinion! And the code looks more clean.

Regards,
Riccardo Bestetti

From: hermes.belusca@sfr.fr
To: ros-dev@reactos.org
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:15:36 +0100
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 57701: [CSRSRV] - Use a variable ServerDll instead of using each time CsrLoadedServerDll[i], as it is done in some other places. - Clean the code (remove extra-parentheses). - Zero-out t...


I did the change because I don’t see the point having extra-parentheses around a single term (ServerDll , or ServerDll->HardErrorCallback), it makes reading difficult (but I’m of course ok with such things : if ((var_1 >= a) && (var_1 <= b))     ), and furthermore this thing happens only in these instructions : if ((ServerDll) && (ServerDll->A_Callback)) or if ((CsrLoadedServerDll[i]) && (CsrLoadedServerDll[i]->SizeOfProcessData)) in the code…

 

Regards,

Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO

 

De : ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] De la part de Alex Ionescu
Envoyé : mercredi 14 novembre 2012 05:34
À : ReactOS Development List
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 57701: [CSRSRV] - Use a variable ServerDll instead of using each time CsrLoadedServerDll[i], as it is done in some other places. - Clean the code (remove extra-parentheses). - Zero-out t...

 

Would you mind not "cleaning up formatting" by going against our coding style and doing the very thing I even taught you not to do during your initial patches/code reviews?

 

Thanks.


Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:08 PM, <hbelusca@svn.reactos.org> wrote:

-        if ((ServerDll) && (ServerDll->HardErrorCallback))
+        if (ServerDll && ServerDll->HardErrorCallback)

 


_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev




_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev