By naming it win32, are you aware of the already moving 64bit train? By that coming awful compromises as Win32 on Win64, Com-reg dublicatgion and maybe one source compatible just win- subsystem Oh, that's all awful with this naming. BTW I do also like the (original) idea of freely exchangeable sub system. That sayd it will also be the case that win32 is the primary+default delivered and compiled personality.
Casper Hornstrup schrieb:
It would be advantageous to first have a discussion and then a vote.
It makes sense that Win16 be separate too so why not call the module win32 instead?
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Emanuele Aliberti Sent: 9. oktober 2005 13:12 To: ReactOS Development List Subject: [ros-dev] svn://svn.reactos.org/trunk/windows
Should I call for a VOTE, or is it OK having a top level module for all Win32 related pieces? Please, comment. Thank you in advance.
-- :Emanuele Aliberti
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev