By naming it win32, are you aware of the already moving 64bit train?
By that coming awful compromises as Win32 on Win64, Com-reg dublicatgion
and maybe one source compatible just win- subsystem
Oh, that's all awful with this naming.
BTW I do also like the (original) idea of freely exchangeable sub
system. That sayd it will also be the case that win32 is the
primary+default delivered and compiled personality.
Casper Hornstrup schrieb:
It would be advantageous to first have a discussion and
then a vote.
It makes sense that Win16 be separate too so why not call the module
win32 instead?
-----Original Message-----
From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of
Emanuele
Aliberti
Sent: 9. oktober 2005 13:12
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: [ros-dev]
svn://svn.reactos.org/trunk/windows
Should I call for a VOTE, or is it OK having a top level module for all
Win32 related pieces?
Please, comment.
Thank you in advance.
--
:Emanuele Aliberti
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev