17 Feb
2009
17 Feb
'09
1:57 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev@gmail.com wrote:
I personally feel consistent application of the style is also important, and that there does not exist a reason to deviate from the established coding style in this situation.
I agree that it is good to follow the consistent coding style. The question is this style itself is good.
I meant the abstract case of ((a = b) && (c = d)), not the concrete case of ((ConvKey == HashEntry->ConvKey) && (Length == Ncb->NameLength)).
Sorry to interrupt, but could you please fix your mailer? It breaks the thread with every reply you make.