Re: [ros-dev] White Paper outdated ?

[Jerry]

I would have to agree with David here. Windows XP should be the target 
for compatibility.

David Hinz wrote:

>   TwoTailedFox schrieb:
> >   Psychologically, "Windows 2000
> > Compatible" sounds a lot better than
> >  "Windows NT 4.0 Compatible" 
>  The thing is, most people don't even know, that Windows XP is actually 
>  Windows NT 5.1 (or Windows 2000 ist Windows NT 5.0).
>  So it really makes sense to at least say "Windows 2000 compatible", as 
>  _most_ people don't know, that it makes nearly no difference (from the 
>  developers point of view) what the development target is, as it is 
>  nearly the same.
>
>  So maybe the development target should be set to Windows XP, as there 
>  are quite a lot people, not even knowing about Windows XP being the 
>  successor of Windows 2000.
>
>  Greets,
>
>  David Hinz
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  

-- 
Listen to Americas Debate Radio at 9 o'clock eastren on Wensdays! 
http://radio.americasdebate.net/listen/low (Dial Up)
http://radio.americasdebate.net/listen/    (BroadBand)

Call in at:
1-888-DEBATE-5
1-912-342-2345
Skype: callto://americasdebate