14 Dec
2004
14 Dec
'04
5:09 p.m.
Jason Filby wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:59:10 -0600, Robert Shearman rob@codeweavers.com wrote:
Why would you want us to change from a very flexible debug logging system to a less flexible one?
Obviously not; I don't know the WINE debugging system, I was just giving an example of where our systems probably differ quite a bit. There could be resistance on either side depending on the issue. If we can agree on common ground to make porting easier, it would be great!
I don't understand why there is a need for converting to DPRINT, DPRINT1, etc. Why can't you just define TRACE, WARN and FIXME to DPRINT? You won't get the runtime enabling or disabling of debug channels, but then presumably you don't want support for this.
Rob