Re: [ros-dev] Development process - once again

[Steven Edwards]

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Alex Ionescu [e-mail] wrote:
> 1<- At this step, someone responsible for win32k should've gotten the
> bug report, and maybe had time to reject the patch

This implies that module has an owner. Not every module does. Some
people such as yourself and Fireball are adamant about reviewing what
goes in and spotting breakages real quick. Other parts like the BSD
code used in the network stack might not have the same level of review
so step 1 could be a non-starter. I agree with all the other steps
though, having branches, commit to the branch, run the test,
integration suite does the rest of the magic and commits to the trunk
everything should be good provided the system and tests are robust
enough.

Thanks
-- 
Steven Edwards

"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo