On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Sir Gallantmon <
ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't see any real reason for maintaining both branches of win32
> subsystem. Arwinss still aims to be driver compatible, right? So, what do we
> gain by fully replicating the Win32 subsystem as Microsoft Windows does it?
> The idea of using Wine code to further the levels of compatibility in
> ReactOS is a good idea, and it has potential to make ReactOS a good choice
> for "thin-client" and terminal server systems because of the X11 driver. I
> personally prefer X11 SSH tunneling over VNC/RDP, because I don't need to
> see the entire remote desktop, just the applications I want to run from
> there. Additionally, Linux distros might include ReactOS and use their
> virtualization solutions to integrate apps installed to ReactOS into the
> overall Linux desktop. Nobody would ever really see the ReactOS desktop, but
> ReactOS would ensure more complete compatibility with Windows apps and
> games.
> I think Arwinss should be the new official win32 subsystem, but meh...