i hope you dont mean we no-devs cant discuss stuff and even learn from you

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Alex Ionescu <ionucu@videotron.ca> wrote:


> Ergo, we may define them to correctly reflect the EFLAGS register.

Who is "WE"? You're not even a DEV for this project!

>
> However, but I think Alex is right that the compatible identifiers
> should be retained.
> EFLAG_SIGN and EFLAG_ZERO  are used to compare flags in AH after LAHF,
> and should be retained verbatim, since they are public (in NTDDK.H).
> As for any MS EFLAGS_xx definitions, I'm not privvy and can't say.

Then shut up and don't post completely USELESS and wrong information.