When complete the installation of the driver placa GF8200A shipeset 8200 Through the message that the dll not found Wow32.dll
MainFrameBase::OpenShellFolders():parent_pidl=C:\Documents and Settgs\Administrator\Desktop MainFrameBase::OpenShellFolders(): pidl_abs=(null) (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\create.c:148) Status c0000013 (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\create.c:148) Status c0000013 (drivers\flesystems\cdfs\common.c:196) STATUS_VERIFY_REQUIRED (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:590) CDFS: IRP_MN_VERIFY_VOLUME (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:467) CdfsVerifyVolume() called (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:494) Deviceobject B1285A48 Device to verify B1285A48 (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\devctrl.c:34) FIXME: CdfsDevieControl called without FileObjec! (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsct.c:511) Different volume! (drives\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:518) OenFile \ RefCount 1 (drivers\fiesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:518) OpenFie \loader RefCount 0 (drivers\flesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:518) OpenFile \reactos RefCount 0 (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:518) OenFile \reactos\system32 RefCoun 0 (drivers\filesystems\cdfs\common.c203) IoVerifyVolume() returned (Status c0000012) (drivers\filesysems\cdfs\create.c:148) Status 8000016 MainFrameBase::OpenShellFolders():parent_pidl=(null) MainFrameBase:OpenShellFolders(): pidl_abs=D:\ MDIMainFrame PM_OPEN_WINDOW: pat=D:\ MainFrameBase::OpenShellFolders():rent_pidl=D:\ (lib\rtl\path.c:256) don't keep the directory handl open on removable media (dll\ntdll\ldr\utils.c:2301) Faile to create or open dll section of'WOW32.DLL' (Status c0000135) (d\ntdll\ldr\utils.c:1512) failed tload WOW32.DLL (subsystems\win32csrss\csrsrv\api\wapi.c:115) CSR:received hard error c0000135 WARNING: MmLockPageableDataSectio at ntoskrnl\mm\ARM3\drvmgmt.c:62s UNIMPLEMENTED! WARNING: MmUnlockPageableImageSecon at ntoskrnl\mm\ARM3\drvmgmt.c: is UNIMPLEMENTED! (ntoskrnl\se\semgr.c:299) SidInTok Calls: 30000
2011/8/26, ros-dev-request@reactos.org ros-dev-request@reactos.org:
Send Ros-dev mailing list submissions to ros-dev@reactos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ros-dev-request@reactos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at ros-dev-owner@reactos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ros-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (caemyr@myopera.com)
- Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (Eric Kohl)
- Re: [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an incorrect string being used... (Ged Murphy)
- Re: [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an incorrect string being used... (Aleksey Bragin)
- Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (Aleksey Bragin)
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:29:55 +0200 From: caemyr@myopera.com Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance To: "ReactOS Development List" ros-dev@reactos.org Message-ID: 1314307795.18690.140258133790149@webmail.messagingengine.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
@Eric
http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579 http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952
Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not inherently broken.
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:03 +0200, "Pierre Schweitzer" pierre.schweitzer@reactos.org wrote:
Hi,
finally. Colin and I are pleased to announce you that ReactOS Linux KVM tests are back online and working. You can find the first tests results (on r53383) sent tonight by the testbot on testman: http://www.reactos.org/testman/.
Regards, Pierre.
ReactOS Development List ros-dev@reactos.org wrote on Sat, August 20th, 2011, 4:24 PM:
Timo Kreuzer timo.kreuzer@web.de wrote:
What about fixing release buildbot first?
It's still a private machine owned and administered solely by Christoph.
As long as I can't even reach him by phone, we can only wait.
And is there a chance, maybe in the future, to switch buildbots more easily, to have a backup solution running?
First of all, we hope that we can get the same reliability as our other servers after reinstalling the server OS, giving more ReactOS admins access to the machine and adding monitoring. The current OS was meant to be reinstalled for quite a long time, but up
to now, nobody with physical access to the machine had any time to do it.
If such problems continue to exist afterwards, we can try to set up a fallback system, but this would require an equally configured and powerful Linux machine first.
One week without debug builds is a serious thing.
I hope you're aware that builds are still properly uploaded, it's only the testing step which fails.
- Colin
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
With best regards Caemyr
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 01:01:40 +0200 From: Eric Kohl eric.kohl@t-online.de Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance To: ReactOS Development List ros-dev@reactos.org Message-ID: 4E56D454.6060606@t-online.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Olaf,
I am already investigating the services test issues. One of my first findings is that the current widl seems to mess up value ranges in some cases. This is the cause of the following errors: err:(dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c:6496) value exceeded bounds: 918, low: 0, high: 514
<rant> It is pretty annoying that jgardou updated rpcrt4, widl and other components without proper testing. At least he should have posted a bug list BEFORE he comitted the new stuff. </rant>
Regards Eric
@Eric
http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579 http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952
Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not inherently broken.
Message: 3 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:05:21 +0100 From: "Ged Murphy" gedmurphy.maillists@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an incorrect string being used... To: ros-dev@reactos.org Message-ID: 004201cc63c6$e7a44a40$b6ecdec0$@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
fireball@svn.reactos.org wrote:
- Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in
LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption().
'where necessary'm I don't understand this change. People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode. Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it necessary?
Ged.
Message: 4 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:13:26 +0400 From: Aleksey Bragin aleksey@reactos.org Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an incorrect string being used... To: ReactOS Development List ros-dev@reactos.org Message-ID: 7766A32C-3CB0-446A-96F4-4EDC73BC3A29@reactos.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
On Aug 26, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Ged Murphy wrote:
fireball@svn.reactos.org wrote:
- Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in
LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption().
'where necessary'm I don't understand this change. People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode. Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it necessary?
This was a test for attention, and so far I got a few notices in IRC and one in ros-dev. Good!
Seriously, the change slipped through because I was editing source code of both RTL (which works both at umode and kmode) and NTDLL/LDR (which is only umode) a while ago. Of course, Nt is "preferable" in usermode because there is just no reason to use Zw there.
WBR, Aleksey Bragin.
Message: 5 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:15:24 +0400 From: Aleksey Bragin aleksey@reactos.org Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance To: ReactOS Development List ros-dev@reactos.org Message-ID: 1F3FEE77-59BC-4D24-83A9-5D280FB45966@reactos.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
On Aug 26, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Eric Kohl wrote:
<rant> It is pretty annoying that jgardou updated rpcrt4, widl and other components without proper testing. At least he should have posted a bug list BEFORE he comitted the new stuff. </rant>
I also ranted about that. In fact that's why I stopped syncing rpcrt4 some time ago - because new version always gave problems. So I wanted to solve problems first and only then commit.
But, OK, as Olaf said - if something needs to be done, let's simply do that and fix everything which broke ;).
WBR, Aleksey.
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
End of Ros-dev Digest, Vol 84, Issue 22