We do have the right not to use the code, but there should be a better
reason than "because it's made by Microsoft"
On 11/27/05, Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> wrote:
There is a clear differnce between closed leaked
source code and GPL
code donated to the community. The whole point of the GPL is to benefit
the entire base of developers and users with your code. If we're going
to start behaving like immature brats "oh noes! It's MS GPL! ewww it's
got the cooties!" then all we're doing is undermining the very essence
of the open source movement. If you want MS to change their practices
and start embracing this practice, it's not by denying them the right to
have their code used that you're going to be helping things. By denying
their code, you're just acting selfishly like a child and will make them
think twice about what the whole point of Open Sourcing software is, if
they're still bring treated like shit?
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
--
Mike