Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-diffs] [tretiakov] 21429: [AUDIT] msgina is clean.

[Ged Murphy]

Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
>   Ged Murphy wrote:
>    
> >   Me either. But my point is, what if Thomas used
> > some reversing to obtain
> >  internal functions names for instance (highly unlikely as he doesn't
> >  work like that)
> >       
>  I told him that I consider them clean. There's no internal functions in
>  msgina that I can remember writing. All exported functions were
>  documented. Apart from that, it's a very minimalistic and very
>  incomplete implementation.
>
>  The only DLL of those three unlocked that is not officially documented
>  is acledit. I took all information from th sysinternals homepage. It
>  doesn't contain any code.
>
>  - Thomas
>     
Cool :)
I just think we need to leave info in the log to explain why something 
was unlocked, for historical purposes.

Ged.