Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 44464: [RTL] Rewrite the rtl bitmap implementation. The old one was a little .... suboptimal. The new one should outperform the old one by several orders of magnitude, especially RtlFindClearBits that was literally searching bit by bit.

[Timo Kreuzer]

Because this is a host module.

Alex Ionescu wrote:
>   Well why this then? They should be intrinsics...
>
>  On 2009-12-07, at 8:43 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
>
>    
> >  >> +unsigned char BitScanForward(ULONG *
> > Index, unsigned long Mask)
> > >> +{
> > >> +    *Index = 0;
> > >> +    while (Mask && ((Mask & 1) == 0))
> > >> +    {
> > >> +        Mask >>= 1;
> > >> +        ++(*Index);
> > >> +    }
> > >> +    return Mask ? 1 : 0;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +unsigned char BitScanReverse(ULONG * const Index, unsigned long Mask)
> > >> +{
> > >> +    *Index = 0;
> > >> +    while (Mask && ((Mask & (1 << 31)) == 0))
> > >> +    {
> > >> +        Mask <<= 1;
> > >> +        ++(*Index);
> > >> +    }
> > >> +    return Mask ? 1 : 0;
> > >> +}
> > >>          
>  Best regards,
>  Alex Ionescu
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>