This is the point where Maya mistakes most of all: ReactOS is an
opensource and a FREE project. Managing and working in an opensource
project is different.
We can't compare ReactOS engineering technologies with Alcatel
engineering technologies. Or with Microsoft technologies.
But I try to keep the most valuable what we have in ReactOS, and what
is lost in some other project which tries to provide Windows
compatibility - freedom. And my intention is to keep this even after
commercial ReactOS vendors appear.
I won't repeat all valid points Ged, Alex and Steven said, and some
of Marc's email is right too.
One can demand something from another team member, but the difference
is that the result very well may be as Alex outlined in his fishing
analogy.
As for another question, by Marc or by Alexandru, there is no real
development roadmap of ReactOS, the one on the website should
actually be removed, since it's mostly incorrect.
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
On Oct 31, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Alex Ionescu wrote:
Wake the fuck up, this isn't Codeweavers (not
saying this in a bad
way) and you know very well that Wine wouldn't be where it is today
without CW and Google.
CW and Google (read: $$$$$$) is what made Wine what it is today.
Read my reply to Marc -- I'm surprised you +1'ed this.