Here I am quitting from ReactOS for fireball does like what I writing or my code style
Do not forget alex broken trunk/reactos over 1 year and did leave it and fireball did not force him working in a branch Now he blame me on breaking thing when he and alex have breaking even worse thing. I was not avail write code on ros 1-2 month each time trunk was broken by alex and fireball, and it still are broken for me for around 2-3 booting are need it some time get it start.
Now he using me as excuses for his behaviors I do not tolerate it any longer. and he blame me for cause regress when I fixing correct behavior on some gdi api or win32k, even reveres correct bugfix for win32k example aleinid class commit to ros, was revert, it was correct fix. Our gdi/user32/win32k are not in good shape allot own implemented or port from wine that is not compatible with windows nt arch at all
MY final word: I deleted all code I have been working on so do not ask for it, This is final word from me and bye from my part from this project you have great thanks to fireball why I quitting
One thing more do not forget that steven is starting paying some of the devs in ReactOS , he and fireball are trying to go Commercial so they trying shutdown ReactOS and make it into project codename unros. This info is not public and only few devs known of it, and of cures he will deny this.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aleksey Bragin" aleksey@reactos.org To: "ReactOS Development List" ros-dev@reactos.org Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:05 AM Subject: Re: [ros-dev] when will I return Magnus Olsen aka GreatLord(gedmurphy)
On Jun 20, 2008, at 1:43 AM, Cameron Gutman wrote:
I tested some of GreatLord's regressions and I can see how Aleksey would get angry about all the fixes he has to do to GreatLord's code, but GreatLord has fixed a whole lot more than he has broken and Fireball chasing around 'if (Foo == FALSE)' and changing it to 'if (!Foo)' seems pointless. We've got plenty of code formatted as 'if (Foo == FALSE)' in the kernel that works great. Aleksey is making more work for himself by making needless changes to GreatLord's code. All that is needed is someone with commit access that is willing to correct GreatLord's comments. I don't have a problem with finding a regression of GL's here or there. Sure he should test his code before committing but as far as breakages, but his code usually correct and all coders create breakages one time or another.
This whole paragraph (except the first line) sounds greatlordish :).
Speaking of which, Magnus, why don't you participate in the discussion yourself? You started it, so get into, say something, you are being discussed here, so might be you could explain where I was not right, or something.
But note, it was purely your decision to bring out the problem to public, so enjoy the consequences yourself too. Speaking more global, I think this story starts to make people tired, and is no fun.
I could easily get you a statistics of good vs. reverted, good vs. buggy commits, and nice revert wars GL was doing, but this is unethical and I won't do that. It was our private problem between me and Magnus. And his will to make a drama out of it turned against him. Pretty sad, but I did everything to help, including my help, in my own time (most of the time wasted on "needless" - haha - changes).
WBR, Aleksey. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev