I blame andrewweb.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey@reactos.org> wrote:
On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Ged Murphy wrote:

> James Tabor wrote:
>
>>> Although Jim likes the hyperbole, he is right. Arwinss is a stop gap
>>> solution that should eventually be deprecated except for the X11
>>> module and used as a basis for verifying the 'correct' win32
>>> subsystem.
>>
>> I'm for both! One will not replace the other... I have no idea how
>> that got started! Amazing!
>>
>> Posted this before!
>
> I'll show how this got started...
> http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php?
> title=Arwinss&diff=27579&oldid=27578
> It was news to me too....
I wrote that after seeing this:
title=Arwinss&diff=27396&oldid=27018
and similar changes there done when I was away.

As every piece of software, Arwinss (Wine32) is a stopgap between
v1.0 and v3.0. When something better evolves, surely we'll use it.


WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev