6 May
2011
6 May
'11
8 a.m.
I do not know about you but I would rather spend time dealing with reports
that are detailed and concise than waste time dealing with a very vague
report; whether or not the report is from a developer. Wasting time is not
good. Sure better to have *concise* bug report than no bug report, but no
bug report is better than *vage-and-not-explanatory* bug report IMO
Just my opinion.
On Fri, 06 May 2011 17:56:46 +1000, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo
<elhoir(a)gmail.com> wrote:
@Olaf,
yes, i agree that devs need useful bug reports, with debug logs, and
regress
tests if possible.... but, its always better to have a bug report than to
not to have them, isnt it?
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Adam <geekdundee(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Although Olaf does indeed have a point. And vicmarcal was on IRC for a
> few
> hours going on about this as well; even when I was trying to have
> conversations with other developers regarding another issue.
>
> Not that I have anything against vicmarcal, but such interruptions do
> not
> help. And the reports seem like the "It doesn't work" reports you may
> see
> from end users who do not know what the problem is.
>
>
> On Fri, 06 May 2011 10:03:11 +1000, Zachary Gorden <
> drakekaizer666(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Olaf, I understand your frustration with this kind of stuff, but we do
> not
>> need this kind of antagonistic language. I consider both of you to be
>> good
>> friends, and I would prefer not to see you two go at each other like
>> this
>> or
>> let it spiral out of control.
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Olaf Siejka <caemyr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Bugzilla is crowded with untouched bugs for so long, and you HAVE to
>> add
>>> more crud to it? Bugs like no.6214, very usefull as we can see below:
>>>
>>> "1)Download ClickToDesktop
>>> 2)Run in ReactOS
>>> 3)Click on the desktop to hide. It doesn't work. Apps just lost the
>>> focus.
>>>
>>> Nothing appears in the DebugLog."
>>>
>>> Now that is informative... Why dont you get back doing something
>>> useful
>>> for
>>> a change?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/