Re: [ros-dev] r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

[ShadowFlare]

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:48 PM, breakoutbox <breakoutbox(a)web.de> wrote:

>   ShadowFlare wrote:
>
> >   Both sides have their own historical reasons for
> > keeping things the way
> >  they are.
> >
> >  On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Andrew Faulds <ajfweb(a)googlemail.com<mailtomailto:
> >  ajfweb(a)googlemail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     I don't think Microsoft was wrong, I think Hard
> >     Disk manufacturers have tried to make them wrong in this case.
> >
> >  
>  I didn't talk about history.
>
>  But if You like :: let's look into history. One day in ...
>
>  ".. December 1998 the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), the
>  leading international organization for worldwide standardization in
>  electrotechnology, approved as an IEC International Standard names and
>  symbols for prefixes for binary multiples for use in the fields of data
>  processing and data transmission. The prefixes are as follows .."
>  http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
>
>  ... and since 1998 things changed.
>  
Sorry, thought you were talking about the size and not the name.  Thanks for
clarifying.