Can't we use "optional" here instead of "o"? I know it will
require
two more seconds to write, but it is much more self-documenting than "o".
Casper
________________________________________
From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.com [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.com] On Behalf Of
ea(a)svn.reactos.com
Sent: 15. august 2005 19:31
To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.com
Subject: [ros-diffs] [ea] 17400: Add winemine.
Add winemine.
Modified: trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff
________________________________________
Modified: trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff
--- trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff 2005-08-15 17:04:34 UTC (rev 17399)
+++ trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff 2005-08-15 17:30:20 UTC (rev 17400)
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@
modules\rosapps\cmdutils\mode\mode.exe 1 o
modules\rosapps\cmdutils\touch\touch.exe 1 o
modules\rosapps\games\solitaire\sol.exe 1 o
+modules\rosapps\games\winemine\winemine.exe 1 o
modules\rosapps\mc\mc.exe 1 o
modules\rosapps\net\ncftp\ncftp.exe 1 o
modules\rosapps\net\niclist\niclist.exe 1 o