Re: [ros-dev] Error handling

[Phillip Susi]

How is it not readable?  I think it is MUCH better than the original 
code.  You don't have a half dozen lines of (mostly duplicated) cleanup 
code after every call, but what you're calling and what you're passing 
to it are still quite clear.  Like I said though, it still isn't as 
ideal as SEH, but it's not the terrible mess the original code was.  If 
you have any suggestions on how to make it even more clean, I'm all ears.

Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
>   Phillip Susi wrote:
>  
> >   Now that code is more compact and maintainable
> > than the original, and 
> >  will produce a leaner binary. 
>  
>  
>  No offense, but to me that code is barely readable. Using macros for 
>  such things imo is inappropriate, I rather don't want to debug such 
>  generated code.
>  
>  Best Regards,
>  
>  Thomas
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>