Re: [ros-dev] Tree Changes

[Emanuele Aliberti]

Casper Hornstrup wrote:

>  Like in CVS, after the conversion, the other subsystems
> will get their
> own Subversion module. Ie.
>
> /trunk/reactos
> /trunk/os2
> /trunk/posix
>
> This require developers of the OS/2 and posix subsystems to check out both
> the os2/posix and reactos modules, but it makes it possible for the Win32
> developers (which are still the majority) to only checkout a single module
> in order to build a bootable CD. Here, I assume that we can all agree to
> move freeldr to /trunk/reactos/freeldr after the conversion.
>
>   
>  
I forgot that: I think it is fine having separate modules for optional 
subsystems and requiring having the core system too to build them. The 
problem I spot in the main module is mixing core os and win32 pieces. As 
I said, there are two ways: a) forget NT and say ROS is a Win32 
reimplementation (you don't need separating native and Win32 CSR/GUI 
modules); b) remember ntos is the system and that it can run *without* 
Win32, therefore make apparent there are two distinct pieces of software 
in the 'reactos' module.

Emanuele Aliberti