Sorry, I meant to say git -- and I think Aleksey understood it as &quot;git&quot; too.<div><br></div><div>I&#39;m surprised you had import problems -- Hg is widely recognized as having an excellent built-in &quot;converter&quot; for most other repositories.</div>
<div><br clear="all">Best regards,<br>Alex Ionescu<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/1/8 Timo Kreuzer <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:timo.kreuzer@web.de">timo.kreuzer@web.de</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">



  
  

<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"><div class="Ih2E3d">
Aleksey Bragin wrote:
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre>The main problem with Hg is the same problem I have with GCC,  
Cygwin, etc -- it&#39;s a Linux tool built for Linux-based projects,  
with a fanatic Linux-based fanbase that won&#39;t care much about  
Windows support, stability and performance..
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre>So true... I&#39;m sick of those fanatics, though recently I see a  
decrease of their count, and a fresh view on FOSS world by people  
(here in Russia).
  </pre>
</blockquote></div>
Are you talking about Git or Hg now?<br>
<br>
</div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Ros-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ros-dev@reactos.org">Ros-dev@reactos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev" target="_blank">http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>