On 9/24/07, Magnus Olsen magnus@greatlord.com wrote:
It seam u fall into he SFLC traps they are trying push doing the audlt of ros from a 3 part project of ros, and we shall obay theirs rules it mean all api that is not document in msdn shall be remove and so on. That mean 80% of ntoskrnl will go away, for around 80% of ntoskrnl are not in msdn 80% of win32k will go aways, for thuse api are not in msdn, then shall we not talk about audio no audio system and so on.
I am so sick of the lies you are spewing. No one (except Mingw-w32api) has ever said only use stuff only from MSDN. They have said show us an application that uses this api, explain how you documented it, one of those sources of documentation can be MSDN, if its not MSDN explain how you came to figure out the prototype either via test case or reversing the third party application using the implementation. NOT REVERSING the implementation itself and then reimplementing it.
If your going to run your mouth and attack the SFLC and the Wine project, at least do it with a credible argument like I have done.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-September/059310.html
DO NOT RESTORE TO LIES and DISTORTIONS of fact. It just makes your case look weaker.