14 Oct
2005
14 Oct
'05
10:17 a.m.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:50, Richard Campbell wrote:
Murphy, Ged (Bolton) wrote:
apps.
Actually, come to this of it, you make a fair point.
I'm dead against having application code in the trunk, as I'm sure everyone
else is. However shipping a few 'enhancements' with the prebuilt release
builds can only help with much needed publicity. (assuming they meet
licensing demands). They can always be dropped as we get closer to the 1.0
build (where I think user choice should take precedence via the package
manager)
WaxDragon mentioned including some of our apps like Solitaire with 0.2.8.
Although everyone seemed to like the idea, we don't have a definitive answer
yet.
Are we going ahead with this one?
Ged.
************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk
<mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com
Richard Campbell wrote:
Normally i'd take this hardline stance on 3rd party apps, but if we say,
ship firefox with ReactOS 0.3, we'd raise a lot of eyebrows. Suddenly
this puny operating system that crashes all the time and isn't
compatible with much of anything is running several complex, everyday But how WELL does mozilla work with it? Well
enough we could include it
with 0.2.8?
No, it's still full of bugs.
Mozilla won't be included anyway, it's a 3rd party app.
Ged.