1 Jan
2005
1 Jan
'05
9:46 a.m.
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
it".
From: Mike
Nordell
With the risk of being overly obvious, I think 0.2.5 should
not be allowed without it since it can potentially endanger
users hardware.
I'm not against including the patch, in fact, my vote is "yes, include
It's just that we have established a procedure for
changes after code
freeze: discuss the change on the mailing list and vote on it. Let's try
to
stick to what we agreed on before.
Seemingly my position was possible to misunderstand. Maybe I wasn't clear
enough.
My vote is: "yes, include it".
/Mike