Hi,
On 1/4/06, Ge van Geldorp <gvg(a)reactos.org> wrote:
I was assuming that every developer is subscribed
to ros-bugs, apparently an
incorrect assumption. On the other hand, perhaps ros-bugs is redundant and
Bugzilla reports should go to ros-dev instead?
I think ros-bugs is kind of redundant. Its not like we get that many
reports yet. I think we should freeze the list and just forward it to
ros-dev until we start getting more than say 10 bug reports a day.
Ros-Bugs is one of our most active lists. It's very useful and I would
really like to see this stay.
IMO, Ros-SVN is kinda redundant as the info it displays is available in
Ros-Diffs
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org