Hi,
--- Robert K�pferl rob@koepferl.de wrote:
Please, all, tell me, what are you insisting so much on so unimportand features like transparent encryption and transparent compression. In my eyes the first step is to have a FS which is better than FAT and allows ACLs+EA or xattr+posix-acls (NOTE these are mostly isomorphisms). Most people can pass on enc+compr at all. Some use it but they can wait or also pass on it until it can/will be implemented or not implemented. There exist ways to come around that. Even GPL. See 7zip and TrueCrypt. For my requirements TrueCrypt beats NTFS-EFS. So why bother.
If you want to extend vfat support which we have already done in our vfatfs.sys by adding support for xbox fatx, then I propose we add Transactional Fat support. The idea was first proposed on LKML and then later implement in WinCE.
Thanks Steven
Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html