I'm using git on XP with TortoiseGit (
http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/ ) and it's work perfectly. I am
not vote to use DVCS. I very like idea to using SHA-1 hash for identify
objects (and revisions). I never use Mercurial, but as i know, it also
using SHA-1 hash.. Perhaps Mercurial or Bazaar is better, then Git for
ros, but i'm sure that, git is much better for ros, than svn.

King InuYasha wrote:
> No BLOODY WAY! Git is a pain to use and the tortoise extensions have
> some serious performance problems when dealing with large
> repositories. If we are going to DVCS, go to Mercurial, at least that
> one supports Windows and offers all the same advantages of Git, albeit
> not at as high of a performance gain as Git because of it being cross
> platform and not using POSIX features to heavily optimize it. It's
> still good. In fact, I use Mercurial to check out the latest revisions
> of ReactOS because SVN has a horrible problem of locking up my
> computer for hours on end before actually downloading the repository.
>
> Also, even though Git has come a long way, its not quite as easy to
> use as Mercurial. And if anyone suggest Bazaar, I have one thing to
> say: Slow Interpreted Performance. It could be better, but it isn't.
>
> If ReactOS's target was UNIX systems, then Git would be okay. But this
> is a Windows reimplementation. That implies Windows users.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev