Re: [ros-dev] Prelude to voting for the Testing Coordinator Roles andResponsibilities.

[Aleksey Bragin]

RC working without TC is a nonsense.

RC: "We release"
TC: "There are lots of bugs"
RC: "I don't care, release date is already set".

Does this look serious? I don't think so.
Indefinite delaying of the release due to bugs also shouldn't be allowed, if 
bugs aren't blockers of course.

Before, I thought that RC and TC position could be merged, but now I don't 
think it's good option - project is growing quickly.

Bytheway, can someone please point me how to find a thread with elections of 
Release Coordinator? Our email archive doesn't support search, I tried 
google, but didn't find it.
We usually had Release Engineer? Or is it just rename?


WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "WaxDragon" <waxdragon(a)gmail.com>
To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 4:21 AM
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Prelude to voting for the Testing Coordinator Roles 
andResponsibilities.

>   The main issue from my standpoint is that the Release
> Coordinator
>  should work with the Testing Coordinator.  Brandon and I were trying
>  to work with Robert to train another on doing releases, and when I got
>  back that afternoon from shopping, RC1 was built and up on sourceforge
>  with a rather large bug.  Had we simply waited a day, we would have
>  been able to ship an RC1 without that single bug.  I just wanted us to
>  look good.
>
>  I think the TC is an important position that ReactOS needs, due to
>  it's complexity.  However, I have decided to no longer continue as TC,
>  if I was even TC to start with.
>
>  It's arguments like these that hurt ReactOS more than anything.
>
>  WD