27 Jun
2005
27 Jun
'05
2:07 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:37:04AM -0400, Brandon
Turner wrote:
Why do you consider an altered copyright notice
appropriate?
Good question.
It doesn't matter whether I think it's appropriate or
not. It's not for me to decide, and to the best of my
knowledge, I have not expressed an opinion one way or
the other about thinking that it is or isn't
appropriate.
However, it is up to us to prove that it's explicitly
*not* appropriate (i.e., that they have broken the
license). Because "appropriate" isn't defined in the
license itself, we must rely on a combination of legal
precedence and juristiction-specific law. I am not a
lawyer, so I can't tell you what "appropriate" means.
Thus, until we have proof to the contrary, it must be
assumed to be appropriate.
-- Travis
<snipped for sanity's sake>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail